Here I am again, a year later, and jumping back into OpenLearning19! When I started last year, I was anxious because I did not feel comfortable being out in the open, doing things like blogging and tweeting, but I was ready to try something new and outside of “my box.” To be honest, I cannot say that my experience in OpenLearning18 made me totally comfortable with working in the open, but I really enjoyed my experience. It made me think differently about learning, networks for learning and access to learning.
I am hoping that by participating again, I will continue my journey of baby steps into the Open. One thing is for sure–I am certain that I will meet amazing new colleagues that will make me think and learn. Looking forward to meeting you all in the Open!
This week I learned how little I actually know about Open Access. However, with all its pros and cons, I firmly believe that Open Access is the way of the future for research.
Last week we talked about the ACRL Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. One of the frames is Scholarship as Conversation. This frame outlines the idea that scholars recognize that their work will be discussed, analyzed and debated among peers who may in turn, build upon or disprove their work. In order for this to happen, scholars need access to the work of other scholars.
Traditional methods of publication have limited authors in their ability to retain rights and limited users in their ability to access due to paywalls. Open Access allows authors to choose how they share their work with the scholarly community. Although Open Access is not universal access, it does promote the ideal of universal access and we should champion efforts that support this ideal. Andy Nobes’ article pointed out other problems that limit access in Africa. I believe that periphery publications would gain more attention through an Open Access platform, especially with the help of the DOAJ. Catch up is inevitable in places where internet access itself is still limited and leaders do not value digital progress as Nobes mentions throughout his article. Building infrastructure may be a goal that continues with the next generation and will most likely be slow in some places. Reaching out and including periphery scholarship is something we intentionally must do in order to promote accessibility and progress.
This leads me to ask myself, “What can I do?” As a librarian, I can help spread the word and educate others about Open Access and Creative Commons licensing. I can encourage professors to publish in and teach with Open Access journals and I can intentionally select OER books and teaching tools for the classes I teach. This movement can continue to have momentum only with the support from within the scholarly community. My experience so far in OpenLearning#18 is a great way to keep the idea of Scholarship as Conversation moving forward.
This week in #openlearning18 we are pondering the question: What is the most important thing that learners should know about the internet and the World Wide Web. I thing the most important thing to keep in mind is that they are simply tools. However, as with any tool, there can be many ways to use them, both fun and wonderful as well as scary and dangerous. With that said, I am (cautiously) optimistic about the future of the internet and the Web knowing that people will invent new ways to use these tools that are unimaginable today.
What leads me to be cautious is how quickly I have seen the internet and the web change our lives. We need to slow down a little and think about how we, both individually and collectively, want to use these tools. We have created this amazing sort of “4th place” that blends personal, educational and professional worlds and yet sometimes, it just does not quite feel like reality–as in curated posts on social media and avatars in gaming. Will we loose true conversation to 120 characters and personal interaction to liking and following? Will there be any separation between who we are as individuals and our work world? Or will it all blur in this new 4th place? I do not have the answers, nor am I saying this is all essentially bad. As a private person, I sometimes find this new digital shift personally invasive, other times I find it incredibly useful and educational.
As for the higher education arena, students in college today are digital natives and they have never known a world without the internet or the web. The digital world is interwoven into their existence and higher education needs to meet them in their own environment. However, higher education can play a role in making students slow down and think about how they use these tools by setting the example and guiding them in positive ways. As a librarian in higher education, one example would be to show students how to break down Google search results to recognize advertisements and bias. As a teaching librarian, I always try to incorporate some sort of hands-on, digital activity since this is a familiar environment to students. I look forward to see how this new generation chooses to incorporate these tools in the new digital age.
One thing the readings this week made clear about Open Education was that we can have all the openness imaginable, but without knowing how to navigate and use these sources and tools, there really is no education. If you give someone a car, it does not help them get to where they want to go unless we teach them how to drive.
I am viewing Open Education through the lens of a librarian. I believe my professional colleagues find it their responsibility to connect and educate people about information. Librarians have always advocated for access to information as well as promoted the skills to evaluate and use information. Therefore, as discussed this week and stated by Franklin D. Roosevelt, libraries are essential to democracy.
However, what struck me this week was the idea of authority. Jeffrey Pomerantz discusses how in this age of information overload, we must all take on an authority role when it comes to the evaluation of information. The new Association of College and Academic Libraries Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education discusses how “authority is constructed and contextual” and an expert user of information is one that has become an expert in the critical evaluation of sources. Learning will not occur through open education without this level of authority as a critical consumer of information. I believe this is something librarians instinctively understand and why we need to make sure we continue to be involved in the Open Education movement.
”Tell me and I forget. Teach me and I remember. Involve me and I learn.”
– Ben Franklin
I am excited to be involved with #OpenLearning18 because it offers the experience of sharing ideas with likeminded individuals who are interested in improving learning. What I want to know is how others are incorporating both the concept of open learning, as well as the tools of open learning, into their work. I want to know how others think open learning will (or could) impact education at all levels.
What I hope to contribute to #OpenLearning18 is a willingness to share, participate and ask questions (sorry, I am a novice!) I hope to encourage, and to be encouraged, to find new ways of applying the concept of open learning to improve my teaching and promote sharing among colleagues. I am looking forward to this experience with all of you!